The Cardiothoracic Anaesthetic Society of South Africa practice advisory for the perioperative management of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in South Africa

AR Keene; P Motshabi; N Mdadla; J Swanevelder; E Turton; H Maakamedi; D Murfin; A Vorster; L-A Drummond

Authors

AR Keene University of the Witwatersrand
P Motshabi University of the Witwatersrand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9990-6336
N Mdadla Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-4382
J Swanevelder University of Cape Town https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6986-4470
E Turton University of the Free State https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-7691
H Maakamedi University of Pretoria
D Murfin
A Vorster University of Cape Town
L-A Drummond https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-8716

Keywords:

anaesthesia management, pacemaker

Abstract

Pacemakers (PM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are likely to be encountered by anaesthetists in South Africa in everyday practice because of increasing rates of implantation of these cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for an expanding group of conditions that qualify for their use. These devices are becoming increasingly sophisticated and anaesthetic perioperative management is changing with these developments. Traditionally, PM functions have been changed preoperatively to asynchronous modes because of the fear that electromagnetic interference (EMI) from the electrosurgical unit (ESU or diathermy) may cause oversensing and loss of pacing in patients who are PM-dependent. ICDs have had their anti-tachyarrythmia modes deactivated preoperatively to prevent inadvertent shocks delivered as a result of the misinterpretation of EMI as ventricular tachycardia (v-tach) or ventricular fibrillation (v-fib). Programming these devices in this manner may result in patient harm due to R-on-T phenomenon in PM set in asynchronous mode and in ICDs, undiagnosed v-tach and v-fib going untreated in patients who have anti-tachyarrythmia therapies switched off. Depending on the site of surgery, PM-on and ICD-on strategies may be acceptable. Magnet use intraoperatively can be used safely to change PM and ICD settings with the advantage that reversal to normal settings can be achieved by removal of the magnet once EMI is no longer in use. Intraoperative magnet use mandates that the device is interrogated preoperatively and that the results of magnet application are known to the anaesthetist in advance. Where management protocols stated may be controversial, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) survey of an expert consultant panel as well as member anaesthetists is published, as well as the Cardiothoracic Anaesthetic Society of South Africa (CASSA) committee responses to these controversies.¹

Author Biographies

AR Keene, University of the Witwatersrand

Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

P Motshabi, University of the Witwatersrand

Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

N Mdadla, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University

Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa

J Swanevelder, University of Cape Town

Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa

E Turton, University of the Free State

Department of Anaesthesia, University of the Free State, South Africa

H Maakamedi, University of Pretoria

Department of Anaesthesia, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, University of Pretoria, South Africa

D Murfin

CASSA Committee member

A Vorster, University of Cape Town